TL;DR
In late 2025, a Google mailbox crackdown ran through the cold email world and hit agencies hardest. Rather than chase the next cheap workaround, Jayson DeMers of OutreachBloom moved to InboxKit mid-crisis — and has run OutreachBloom's cold email infrastructure on it ever since, at an 11.5% reply rate and a 0.6% bounce rate.
Switching infrastructure mid-crisis
In late 2025, a Google mailbox crackdown ran through the cold email world. It hit hardest in the agency space, where the teams running outbound for clients depend on sending infrastructure that, when it fails, doesn't break one campaign. It breaks all of them at once. Jayson DeMers of OutreachBloom was one of the operators caught in it.
Rather than wait it out, he went looking for honest answers, and found InboxKit in the middle of the noise. He has been with us ever since. Here is how the switch happened.
For the bigger picture on how OutreachBloom thinks about channels, see our breakdown of AI SEO vs Cold Email vs Reddit.

The Background
OutreachBloom is a multi-channel B2B agency running a full offering across AI SEO, cold email, Reddit, and LinkedIn. On the cold email side, they handle the whole motion for clients, from list building through to reply handling, which means deliverability isn't a nice-to-have for them. It is the foundation their client results sit on.
So when the Google crackdown threatened cold email infrastructure across the board, it put a core part of their service at risk. Jayson did the research and found his way to InboxKit.
The Challenge: when the panels went dark
It is worth being precise here, because two separate things tend to get blurred together.
The backdrop was a policy shift. In early 2024, Google introduced bulk-sender rules around authentication, spam-rate limits, and one-click unsubscribe. For a while, enforcement was soft, and plenty of senders didn't take it seriously.
The event that actually hit agencies was different. In late 2025, Google moved against mailboxes sold through reseller "panels" — cheap inboxes that exploited loopholes in education, nonprofit, and legacy G Suite programs. Cold emailers and agencies woke up to sudden Gmail and Workspace suspensions. Because those accounts were never legitimate to begin with, there was no appeal. Worse, resellers pooled accounts, so when one panel went dark, everyone relying on it went down at the same time.
For an agency running client campaigns on that kind of infrastructure, it was the nightmare scenario: pipelines frozen, with no way to fix it.
He first found InboxKit on Reddit, and stayed for the inbox placement testing, the customer service, and a level of professionalism he wasn't getting elsewhere.
The Approach: why InboxKit
In the middle of the crisis, what set InboxKit apart wasn't a sales pitch. It was clarity. We showed up as a source of straight answers when most of the market was scrambling: what was happening, why, and what to do about it. Jayson came across InboxKit during that period and made the switch in full.
Since then, he has run OutreachBloom's cold email infrastructure on InboxKit, and what he values most is how uncomplicated it is. The feature he depends on is the inbox placement test: the ability to validate that emails are actually landing in the inbox, using the real campaign copy he sends for clients, before they go out at scale.
That matters more than it sounds. For an agency, a campaign that quietly slips into spam means no replies, a frustrated client, and eventually churn. The placement test catches that before it happens, which is why Jayson ranks it as the feature he would least want to work without.
What changed in the workflow
The move wasn't about finding cheaper inboxes. It was about trading fragile, pooled accounts for infrastructure built to be legitimate — and gaining visibility into deliverability before sending, not after.
- Account legitimacy: Loophole accounts with no appeal when suspended → legitimate sending infrastructure
- Failure mode: Pooled accounts, where one panel going down took everyone down → infrastructure run for the agency, not shared panels
- Inbox visibility: Finding out you are in spam only after sending → an inbox placement test on real copy before you scale
The Outcome
The results back it up. As of June 2026, across OutreachBloom's campaigns on InboxKit, the agency maintains an 11.5% reply rate and a 0.6% bounce rate, on 196K+ emails sent. Those are the kind of numbers that only hold when emails are consistently reaching real inboxes.
In Jayson's words:
The professionalism was a cut above the other tools we've used. The pricing was right, the customer service was there. Getting quick, expert support is a really big factor for any software. It's clear InboxKit was built by a team who knows cold email inside and out, that knows what works and what doesn't.
Why it worked
When the panels collapsed, the agencies that recovered fastest weren't the ones chasing the next cheap workaround. They were the ones that moved to infrastructure built to be legitimate, and that gave them visibility into whether their email was actually landing before it went out at scale.
For OutreachBloom, the inbox placement test turned deliverability from something they hoped was working into something they could verify, on the real copy they send for clients. That is what lets an agency stand behind its reply rates, and it is why Jayson made the switch permanent.
About OutreachBloom
OutreachBloom is a multi-channel B2B marketing agency offering AI SEO, cold email, Reddit, and LinkedIn outreach.
Run client campaigns on infrastructure built to land in the inbox. See what InboxKit can do for your agency.
Sources & References
- 1
OutreachBloom(2026)
The complete cold email stack behind results like these
Three specialized tools beat any all-in-one platform on deliverability and cost at scale. This is the canonical setup — data, infrastructure, and sending — that powers campaigns at every stage.

Find & verify B2B emails with 94%+ match rates. 300M+ contacts, phone lookup, and validation — clean leads that never burn reputation on bounces.
Explore Enrich
Mailboxes that land in the primary inbox. Automated DNS, warmup, domain isolation, and InfraGuard monitoring across thousands of sending accounts.
Explore InboxKit
Dedicated IPs on every plan, AI warmup that passes ESP detection, inbox placement testing, and a built-in dialer. The deliverability-first sequencer.
Explore SendKitOne compounding system. Enrich feeds verified leads to SendKit, which sends on InboxKit infrastructure.
Build your stackMore case studies
How LeadHaste Scales to Millions of Emails Without Hours of Manual DNS Work with InboxKit
Managing 100+ client campaigns at scale meant abandoning manual infrastructure work. InboxKit's automation became the only way forward — automated DNS (zero manual hours), domain isolation, zero suspensions, and a 17% average reply rate.
Case StudyOne Click, Not Five: How TGP Automated Mailbox Setup with InboxKit
TGP, the largest prospecting agency in Latin America, was bleeding ops hours stitching together domains, Google Workspace, and email creation across five separate vendors. On InboxKit, that whole chain collapsed into a few clicks — dropping client onboarding from hours to minutes without touching their 15.2% reply rate.
Case StudyHow Anevo Marketing Scaled Infrastructure 10x Faster with InboxKit
A multi-client GTM agency transformed manual mailbox setup into a fully automated, self-service operation. In six months on InboxKit, Anevo Marketing went from zero to 4,361 mailboxes under their own control and cut client setup time from one to two weeks down to one to two hours.
Ready to build infrastructure that scales?
Plans from $39/mo with 10 mailboxes included. Automated DNS, warmup, and InfraGuard monitoring included.